Opened 2 years ago

Closed 12 months ago

#11366 closed Feature request (rejected)

Snap or Flatpack?

Reported by: chymian Owned by:
Priority: normal Component: FileZilla Client
Keywords: Cc:
Component version: Operating system type: Linux
Operating system version:

Description

Dear Maintainers,
it seems that every distribution is far behind your actual release, which contains the storj.io-prot.

Can you please consider to create a snap or flatpack?
that would give the biggest part of linux-community (OSX as well?) instant access to your releases and they would work, independent from the distro(-flaws). … …

IMHO, I would prefer a snap over flatpack, because they have a centralized store and I can search and install from *all* available snaps with one cmd from the cli: "snap find filezilla && snap install filezilla", then i can just run filezilla by it's name, without any complicated run cmds.
Auto-update included!

In opposite, flatpacks are cluttered over the whole internet, and hard to find, need extra cmd-syntax to start, etc. by far not so convenient, but hey, I would not complain ;), but may be others, not so CLI-proofed users.
autoupdate only if I add every special repository (if there is one), ending up in the need to maintain a repository-list on all machines…
Just another sysops nightmare.

Thanks for considering
TIA
guenter

Change History (1)

comment:1 Changed 12 months ago by Tim Kosse

Resolution: rejected
Status: newclosed

No, both are flawed concepts to begin with. You can just compile from source.

they would work, independent from the distro(-flaws).

That's a good joke.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.