Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#3751 closed Bug report (rejected)
Queue sorting differences between recursive and direct downloads
|Reported by:||jwoelper||Owned by:|
|Keywords:||queue sorting directory inverse||Cc:|
|Component version:||Operating system type:||Windows|
|Operating system version:||xp|
Please do not misunderstand: this is not a repeated "inverse queue" bug; rather an inconsistency wich (at least for me and many people i know) almost everytime creates time-consuming work of priority rescheduling:
If I manually create a local directory and download the _contents_ of a remote directory into it, they are perfectly in alphabetical order in the queue. If I directly download the remote folder, the contained files are being downloaded in inverse order compared to the above method. This is particularily neccesary for sequentially numbered image strips, sounds, etc.
Change History (1)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
|Status:||new → closed|
FileZilla never made any guarantees on queue sorting order. On recursive transfers, FileZilla adds the items to the queue in the same order as returned by the server for performance reasons. This is by design.