Queue sorting differences between recursive and direct downloads

[jwoelper]

Please do not misunderstand: this is not a repeated "inverse queue" bug; rather an inconsistency wich (at least for me and many people i know) almost everytime creates time-consuming work of priority rescheduling:
If I manually create a local directory and download the _contents_ of a remote directory into it, they are perfectly in alphabetical order in the queue. If I directly download the remote folder, the contained files are being downloaded in inverse order compared to the above method. This is particularily neccesary for sequentially numbered image strips, sounds, etc.

[Tim Kosse]

FileZilla never made any guarantees on queue sorting order. On recursive transfers, FileZilla adds the items to the queue in the same order as returned by the server for performance reasons. This is by design.