Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #12991, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 4, 2023, 5:14:33 PM (15 months ago)
Author:
John Hossbach

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #12991, comment 6

    v2 v3  
    1818
    1919We have cellular-connected IoT devices that reside on a partner-managed network and are assigned both 10.x and 100.x IPs.  That partner-managed network has direct Internet access (DIA) as well as a VPN tunnel to our internal network.  Communication over the VPN tunnel is the preferred communication path to talk to our servers, but DIA is available as a backup communication method.
     20
     21The IoT devices with 10.x IPs don't have a problem using passive FTP, but the ones with 100.x IPs are having the passive FTP problem.
    2022----
    2123> Any particular reason why you are not simply using IPv6 to avoid having to deal with all the NAT madness?